Comparison of Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Means of Dissociating Adherent Monolayers of Mesenchymal Stem Cells
© Heng et al. 2009
Received: 23 January 2009
Accepted: 30 January 2009
Published: 10 March 2009
The dissociation of adherent mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) monolayers with trypsin and enzyme-free dissociation buffer was compared. A significantly lower proportion of viable cells were obtained with enzyme-free dissociation buffers compared to trypsin. Subsequently, the dissociated cells were re-seeded on new cell culture dishes and were subjected to the MTT assay 24 h later. The proportion of viable cells that reattached was significantly lower for cells obtained by dissociation with enzyme-free dissociation buffer compared to trypsin. Frozen–thawed MSC displayed a similar trend, yielding consistently higher cell viability and reattachment rates when dissociated with trypsin compared to enzyme-free dissociation buffer. It was also demonstrated that exposure of trypsin-dissociated MSC to enzyme-free dissociation buffer for 1 h had no significant detrimental effect on cell viability.
KeywordsDissociation Enzyme Mesenchymal Stem cells Trypsin
Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) have demonstrated tremendous potential in the emerging field of regenerative medicine [1–4]. Nevertheless, a major challenge faced in the clinical application of MSC is the need for adequate cell numbers for achieving optimal efficacy in transplantation therapy. Hence, MSC need extensive ex vivo proliferation within prolonged durations of in vitro culture [5, 6]. To avoid pathogenic transmission, it is imperative to minimize animal and human-derived products within MSC culture [7, 8]. One key animal-derived product is the digestive enzyme trypsin, which is routinely used to dissociate adherent MSC monolayers into single-cell suspensions during serial passages. Alternative enzyme-free methods for dissociating adherent cell monolayers have been developed, such as the various commercially available enzyme-free dissociation buffers [9, 10] that work on the principle of chelating free calcium and magnesium ions in solution; as well as recombinant trypsin-like proteolytic enzymes produced from bacterial fermentation (i.e., TrypLE® Express commercially available from Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). However, it must be noted that enzymatic cell dissociation inevitably results in some degradation of surface proteins and glycoproteins. Hence, enzyme-free cell dissociation is instead sometimes preferred to preserve the structural integrity of membrane surface proteins for ligand binding flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry [11, 12].
This study compares the dissociation of adherent MSC monolayers with either enzyme-free dissociation buffer or trypsin, the most commonly used enzyme for the dissociation of in vitro cultured cells. The viability of the newly dissociated cells was assessed by a simple trypan blue exclusion assay through the use of an automated cell counter. Subsequently, the dissociated MSC was re-plated on new cell culture dishes and subjected to the MTT assay 24 h later, to assess the re-attachment of viable cells. Additionally, similar assays were conducted on frozen–thawed MSC that were dissociated either with trypsin or enzyme-free dissociation buffer.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Cell Viability Assessment
Bone marrow-derived human MSC (Cat no: PT-2501, batch no: 6F4382, cryopreserved at the second passage) were purchased from Lonza (Walkersville, MD, USA). Cryopreserved MSC were thawed and cultured up to five passages upon purchase from Lonza (Walkersville, MD, USA), prior to being utilized for this study. Confluent monolayers of MSC cultured within 12-well cell culture dishes (≈1.0–1.5 × 105 cells per well, surface area ≈ 4.8 cm2) were then dissociated with either 0.05% (w/v) Trypsin–EDTA (0.53 mM EDTA × 4 Na, Cat no. 25300-054; Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) or enzyme-free phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-based cell dissociation buffer (Cat no. 13151-014; Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). According to the manufacturer's specification, the enzyme-free cell dissociation buffer is a membrane-filtered, isotonic, and enzyme-free aqueous formulation of salts, chelating agents, and cell-conditioning agents constituted in Ca2+- and Mg2+-free PBS. Prior to cell dissociation, both trypsin and the enzyme-free cell dissociation buffer were pre-warmed to 37°C within a water bath. The confluent monolayers of MSC cultured within 12-well cell culture dishes were then washed two times with Ca2+-free PBS, prior to the addition of 1 ml trypsin solution or enzyme-free cell-dissociation buffer within each well. These were then placed within the cell culture incubator and subjected to gentle pipetting every 2–3 min. On average, dissociation of confluent MSC monolayers with trypsin takes approximately 5–6 min with gentle pipetting; while with enzyme-free cell dissociation buffer, the corresponding duration is approximately 15 to 16 min. All pipeting was carried out with an automated pipet pump (VWR, Brisbane, CA, USA), and care was taken to ensure that the pipeting force was similar for both experimental groups, by utilizing the same settings and similar volume pipettes. The dissociated cell suspension from each well of the 12-well dish [(1.17 ± 0.06) × 105 cells in 1 ml] were then placed in 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes and subjected to centrifugation at 500×g for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the cell pellet was reconstituted in 0.5 ml PBS (with Ca2+), placed within accessory sample vials (Cat no. 383721, Beckman-Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA) and analyzed for cell viability with the trypan blue exclusion assay, by utilizing an automated cell counter (Vi-Cell® XR analyzer, Cat no. 383556; Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA) and Vi-CELL® XR Quad Pak Reagent Kit (Cat no. 383198; Beckman-Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA). The automated cell counter mixes the cell suspension with an equal volume of 0.4% (w/v) trypan blue solution (500 μl), and automatically accounts for the fold dilution with trypan blue solution. For each experimental group, there were three replicate readings.
2.2. MTT Assay on Reattached Cells
MSC were seeded in 12-well cell culture dishes with 5.0 × 104 cells per well (≈4.8 cm2). After 5 to 6 days of culture, confluent MSC monolayers were attained (1.17 × 105 cells per well), and these were then dissociated with either trypsin or enzyme-free dissociation buffer. Some wells containing intact confluent MSC monolayers were retained as the control and were not dissociated with either trypsin or enzyme-free cell dissociation buffer. The dissociated cell suspension from each well were collected and placed within microcentrifuge tubes and subjected to centrifugation at 500×g for 5 min. The supernatant was then discarded, and the cell pellet was reconstituted in 1.0 ml of cell culture media (MSCGM® bullet kit, Cat no. PT-3001; Lonza, Walkersville, MD, USA) prior to being re-seeded onto fresh 12-well cell culture dishes. After 24 h of culture, the unattached cells were washed off with PBS, and the reattached cells were then subjected to the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay . Briefly, this involved placing 1.0 ml of 1 mg/ml MTT constituted in culture media within each well, following by incubation for 3 h at 37°C in the dark. After incubation, the MTT solution was removed, and the stained cells were washed two times in PBS followed by air-drying. The MTT-formazan products were extracted in the dark at room temperature with 0.25 ml of DMSO in each well. One hundred microliters aliquots of the supernatant in each well were then transferred into a 96-well flat-bottomed cell culture plates, and the absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at 570 nm using a SpectraMax M5 modular microplate reader (Molecular Devices Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). From the absorbance values, the percentage of reattached viable cells (after dissociation with trypsin and cell-free dissociation buffer) can then be computed by dividing the MTT absorbance values obtained after dissociation with the absorbance reading for the nondissociated control (after correction for 100 μl DMSO blanks).
2.3. Effects of Cryopreservation on Cell Viability and Reattachment
Trypan blue exclusion and MTT assays were repeated on frozen–thawed MSC that had been dissociated either with trypsin or enzyme-free dissociation buffer. The cryopreservation solution was composed of DMEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS) and 10% (v/v) DMSO. The dissociated MSC were suspended in 1 ml of cryopreservation solution within cryovials and were subjected to slow cooling within a -80°C refrigerator, through the use of isopropanol freezing containers (Nalgene, Rochester, NY, USA). After 2 h, the frozen cell-suspension within cryovials were immersed and stored in the vapor phase of liquid nitrogen for 1 h, prior to quick thawing within a water bath at 37°C.
2.4. Effects of Prolonged Exposure to Enzyme-free Dissociation Buffer
MSC dissociated with trypsin were exposed to enzyme-free dissociation buffer at 37°C (2.0 × 105 cells per ml) for 1 h within 15 ml polypropylene tubes (Becton-Dickinson) that do not allow cell attachment. Viability of MSC in free suspension, before and after exposure to the enzyme-free dissociation buffer was assessed by the trypan blue exclusion assay, utilizing an automated cell counter.
2.5. Statistical Analysis of Data
There were three replicates for each experimental group, and the results from each data set were expressed as mean ± standard derivations. Differences between data sets were assessed by the paired Student's t test, with a value of p < 0.05 being considered significantly different.
3.1. Cell Viability Assessment
3.2. MTT Assay on Reattached Cells
3.3. Effects of Prolonged Exposure to Enzyme-free Dissociation Buffer
To avoid the proteolytic effect of trypsin, commercially available enzyme-free cell dissociation buffers are sometimes utilized to preserve the structural integrity of membrane surface proteins for ligand binding flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry [11, 12]. Nevertheless, enzyme-free dissociation buffers are not commonly used for the routine serial passage of various primary cell cultures and highly adherent cell lines; despite their potential to be "more gentle" on cells and avoid the potentially damaging proteolytic effects of trypsin on cell surface proteins. To our knowledge, there has not yet been any study to date that systematically investigates and compares the dissociation of confluent MSC monolayers with trypsin and enzyme-free dissociation buffer.
The results of our study showed that the immediate cell viability (trypan blue) was significantly higher upon dissociation with trypsin, compared to enzyme-free dissociation buffer. This was not because exposure of MSC to the enzyme-free dissociation buffer itself had any detrimental effect on cell viability, as demonstrated by the control experiment (Figure 4). Neither is it because of the sudden removal of magnesium and calcium ions through EDTA chelation; because the MSC monolayers were washed with calcium and magnesium free PBS prior to dissociation, and the trypsin solution itself contains EDTA (0.53 mM EDTA × 4 Na) in Ca+2- and Mg+2-free Hanks balanced salt solution. The lower cell viability with enzyme-free dissociation buffer compared to trypsin is thus manifested immediately upon dissociation and is caused neither by deprivation of free calcium ions, nor by prolonged exposure to the enzyme-free buffer per se. Future work is needed to uncover the underlying mechanisms behind these observations. In any case, it can be inferred that dissociation with the enzyme-buffer is more detrimental to MSC viability compared to trypsin. TrypLE® Express was not examined in this study because of the lack of information on the proprietary protease used in it. It is claimed by the manufacturer to strongly resemble trypsin and was therefore expected to produce results comparable to that obtained by Trypsin.
Additionally, the MTT assay showed a stark decrease in the proportion of viable reattached MSC upon dissociation with the enzyme-free buffer compared to trypsin (Figures 2 and 3). Since natural tissue remodeling in vivo requires the breakdown of extracellular matrix by proteolytic enzymes [14–16], so as to enable cellular detachment, migration, and reattachment, it is plausible that the proteolysis of extracellular matrix and adhesion proteins may serve as a natural impetus or signal for cell reattachment to a new substratum. This is probably recapitulated in vitro through the proteolytic action of trypsin. With enzyme-free dissociation buffer, extracellular matrix and adhesion proteins synthesized by the cultured MSC are not digested away. Hence, there is a lack of natural impetus to reattach to a new substratum upon reseeding on new culture dishes. This could possibly explain the stark decrease in the proportion of viable reattached MSC upon dissociation with the enzyme-free buffer compared to trypsin (Figures 2 and 3).
The observation that freeze–thawing did not lead to an immediate significant decrease in cell viability (Figure 1), but resulted in a significant drop in the proportion of viable reattached MSC (Figure 2) is not surprising, considering the fact that post-cryopreservation apoptosis in MSC is well-documented . Apoptosis takes a prolonged duration to manifest and would not be evident immediately after freeze–thawing.
In conclusion, our results show that the dissociation of MSC by enzyme-free buffer, as opposed to trypsin, causes a significant decrease in cell viability and reattachment of the dissociated MSC and, hence, is clearly unsuited for routine serial passage and propagation of MSC as used. Additionally, the data presented in this study would also have implications for the re-plating of dissociated MSC after cell-sorting, since enzyme-free cell dissociation is commonly used in fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) and magnetic affinity cell sorting (MACS ). Further studies are recommended to optimize the use of such buffers to dissociate MSCs for use in routine culture or for cell sorting purposes.
The work was supported entirely by grants from Abbott Vascular.
- Spitkovsky D, Hescheler J: Adult mesenchymal stromal stem cells for therapeutic applications. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008, 17 (2): 79-90. 10.1080/13645700801969758.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones BJ, McTaggart SJ: Immunosuppression by mesenchymal stromal cells: from culture to clinic. Exp Hematol. 2008, 36 (6): 733-741. 10.1016/j.exphem.2008.03.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu Y, Wang J, Scott PG, Tredget EE: Bone marrow-derived stem cells in wound healing: a review. Wound Repair Regen. 2007, 15 (Suppl 1): S18-S26. 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00221.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tae SK, Lee SH, Park JS, Im GI: Mesenchymal stem cells for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Biomed Mate. 2006, 1 (2): 63-71. 10.1088/1748-6041/1/2/003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Toyoda M, Takahashi H, Umezawa A: Ways for a mesenchymal stem cell to live on its own: maintaining an undifferentiated state ex vivo. Int J Hematol. 2007, 86 (1): 1-4. 10.1532/IJH97.07055.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schallmoser K, Rohde E, Reinisch A, Bartmann C, Thaler D, Drexler C, Obenauf AC, Lanzer G, Linkesch W, Strunk D: Rapid large-scale expansion of functional mesenchymal stem cells from unmanipulated bone marrow without animal serum. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2008, 14 (3): 185-196. 10.1089/ten.tec.2008.0060.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meuleman N, Tondreau T, Delforge A, Dejeneffe M, Massy M, Libertalis M, Bron D, Lagneaux L: Human marrow mesenchymal stem cell culture: serum-free medium allows better expansion than classical alpha-MEM medium. Eur J Haematol. 2006, 76 (4): 309-316. 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2005.00611.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sensebé L: Clinical grade production of mesenchymal stem cells. Biomed Mater Eng. 2008, 18 (1 Suppl): S3-S10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Invitrogen Inc. website on enzyme-free cell dissociation buffers: Accessible at the following website address. (Date accessed: 15 September 2008), [http://products.invitrogen.com/ivgn/en/US/adirect/invitrogen?cmd=IVGNcatDisplayCategory&catKey=99501]
- Sigma-Aldrich Inc. website on enzyme-free cell dissociation buffers: Accessible at the following website address. (Date accessed: 15 September 2008), [http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/sigma/usage/c5914use.pdf]
- Sklar LA, Edwards BS, Graves SW, Nolan JP, Prossnitz ER: Flow cytometric analysis of ligand-receptor interactions and molecular assemblies. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2002, 31: 97-119. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.31.082901.134406.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dainiak MB, Kumar A, Galaev IY, Mattiasson B: Methods in cell separations. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2007, 106: 1-18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mosmann T: Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983, 65 (1–2): 55-63. 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rydlova M, Holubec L, Ludvikova M, Kalfert D, Franekova J, Povysil C, Ludvikova M: Biological activity and clinical implications of the matrix metalloproteinases. Anticancer Res. 2008, 28 (2B): 1389-1397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mannello F, Tonti GA, Bagnara GP, Papa S: Role and function of matrix metalloproteinases in the differentiation and biological characterization of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2006, 24 (3): 475-481. 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0333.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mannello F: Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cell recruitment, migration, and differentiation: what have matrix metalloproteinases got to do with it?. Stem Cells. 2006, 24 (8): 1904-1907. 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0608.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmidt-Mende J, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Joseph B, Zhivotovsky B: Freezing induces artificial cleavage of apoptosis-related proteins in human bone marrow cells. J Immunol Methods. 2000, 245: 91-94. 10.1016/S0022-1759(00)00285-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.