Skip to main content

Immunological assays for chemokine detection in in-vitro culture of CNS cells

Abstract

Herein we review the various methods currently in use for determining the expression of chemokines by CNS cells in vitro. Chemokine detection assays are used in conjuction with one another to provide a comprehensive, biologically relevant assessment of the chemokines which is necessary for correct data interpretation of a specific observed biological effect. The methods described include bioassays for soluble chemokine receptors, RNA extraction, RT-PCR, Real — time quantitative PCR, gene array analysis, northern blot analysis, Ribonuclease Protection assay, Flow cytometry, ELISPOT, western blot analysis, and ELISA. No single method of analysis meets the criteria for a comprehensive, biologically relevant assessment of the chemokines, therefore more than one assay might be necessary for correct data interpretation, a choice that is based on development of a scientific rationale for the method with emphasis on the reliability and relevance of the method.

References

  1. 1.

    Power CA, Proudfoot AE. The chemokine system: novel broad-spectrum therapeutic targets.Curr Opin Pharmacol 2001; 1(4):417–424.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Fernandez EJ, Lolis E. Structural studies of chemokines that inhibit HIV-1 entry.Antivir Chem Chemother 2001; 12(1):43–49.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Horuk R. Chemokine receptors.Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2001; 12(4):313–335.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Minagar A, Shapshak P, Fujimura R, Ownby R, Heyes M, Eisdorfer C. The role of macrophage/microglia and astrocytes in the pathogenesis of three neurologic disorders: HIV-associated dementia, Alzheimer disease, and multiple sclerosis.J Neurol Sci 2002; 15:13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Perez-Castrillon JP, Perez-Arellano J, Garcia-Palomo J, Jimenez-Lopez A, De Castro S. Opioids depress in vitro human monocyte chemotaxis.Immunopharmacology 1992;23(1):57–61.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Liu Y, Blackbourn DJ, Chuang LF, Killam KF, Chuang RY. Effects of in vivo and in vitro administration of morphine sulfate upon rhesus macaque polymorphonuclear cell phagocytosis and chemotaxis.J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1992; 263(2):533–539.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Grimm MC, Ben-Baruch A, Taub DD, Howard OMZ, Resau JH, Wang JM, Ali H, Richardson R, Snyderman R, Oppenheim JJ. Opiates transdeactivate chemokine receptors: delta and mu opiate receptor-mediated heterologous desensitization.J Exp Med 1998; 188(2):317–325.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Whiteside TL. Cytokine Assays.Biotechniques 2002; 33:S4-S15.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wong ML, Sternberg EM. Immunological assays for understanding neuroimmune interactions.Arch Neurol 2000; 57(7):9489–9452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chomczynski P, Saachi N. Single step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenolchloroform extraction.Anal Biochem 1987; 162:156–159.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Darbre P. Basic molecular biology: essential techniques. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY: 1–29, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    DeRisi J, Penland L, Brown PO, Meltzer PS, Ray M, Chen Y, Su YA, Trent JM. Use of a cDNA Microarray to Analyse Gene Expression Patterns in Human Cancer.Nature Genetics 1996; 14:457–460.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Schena M, Shalon D, Davis RW, Brown PO. Quantitative Monitoring of Gene Expression Patterns with a Complimentary DNA Microarray.Science 1995; 270:467–470.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mullis KB, Faloona FA, Scharf S, Saiki RK, Horn G, Erlich HA. Specific enzymatic amplification of DNA in vitro: The polymerase chain reaction.Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 1986; 1–124.

  15. 15.

    Ong YL, Irvine A. Quantitative real-time PCR: a critique of method and practical considerations.Hematology 2002; 7(1):59–67.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Thomas PS. Hybridization of denatured RNA and small DNA fragments transferred to nitrocellulose.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1980; 77(9):5201–5205.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Nobrega FG, Dieckmann CL, Tzagoloff A. A rapid method for detecting specific RNA transcripts by hybridization to DNA probes in solution.Anal Biochem 1983; 131(1):141–145.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Prediger EA. Detection and quantitation of mRNAs using ribonuclease protection assays.Methods Mol Biol 2001; 160:495–505.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Darzynkiewicz Z, Crissman HA eds. Flow Cytometry, Vol. 33 Methods in Cell Biology. San Diego, CA; Academic Press, Inc., 1–475, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Robinson J, Paul MNG eds. Current Protocols in Cytometry. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY: 1–59, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Dunn MJ. Detection of total proteins on western blots of 2-D polyacrylamide gels.Methods Mol Biol 1999; 112:319–329.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Perlmann H, Perlmann P. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay.In: Cell Biology: A Laboratory Handbook, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA: 322–328, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Crowther JR. Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 42-ELISA: Theory and Practice. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ: 1–102, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Stott DI. Immunoblotting, dot-blotting, and ELISPOT assays: methods and applications.J Immunoassay 2000; 21(2–3):273–296.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Findlay JWA, Smith WC, Lee JW, Nordblom GD, Das I, DeSilva BS, Khan MN, Bowsher RR. Validation of immunoassays for bioanalysis: a pharmaceutical industry perspective.J Pharm Biomed Anal 2000; 21(6):1249–1273.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Bienvenu J, Monneret G, Fabien N, Revillard JP. The clinical usefulness of the measurement of cytokines.Clin Chem Lab Med 2000; 38(4):267–285.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madhavan P. N. Nair Ph.D..

Additional information

Published: April 7, 2003

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahajan, S.D., Schwartz, S.A. & Nair, M.P.N. Immunological assays for chemokine detection in in-vitro culture of CNS cells. Biol. Proced. Online 5, 90–102 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1251/bpo50

Download citation

Indexing terms

  • Chemokines
  • Central Nervous System
  • Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction